![]() |
| Occupy Wall Street Protesters |
![]() |
| A Tea Party Gathering in Boston |
Really, they are two sides of the same coin. If you think about it, they could probably, if they set their political differences aside, move this country SERIOUSLY back into a socially just track where the power structures are not centered on a particular elite group of people.
![]() |
| Got this linked in from a friend on Facebook |
However, I put this out there: NEITHER MOVEMENT IS CHRISTIAN.
I know that there are folks on both sides that will, at this moment, either rant and scream at me or put my blog on their "ignore" list because I must be blind. Can't they see that Tea Party/Occupy Wall Street is all about what Jesus wants?
There's a picture floating around out there showing Jesus driving folks out of the temple calling him the original Occupy Wall Street protester. There are people who use similar images of Jesus to justify their Tea Party protests and use phrases like "God Bless America" and so on. But you know, both of them I have serious problems with.
Occupy Wall Street - Let's look at this once. Here we have a bunch of people who are complaining about big corporations, big government, greed, and saying that they should give up their money and profits to share it around to those with debt and need. On the surface, that sounds good. But in what I've seen and heard, it sounds more like "Give us the money" rather than anything altruistic about taking care of others. In fact, there are stories coming out about how the restaurants and businesses in the financial district are losing their livelihood because they are getting no customers because people are afraid to go downtown any more. While the protests are protesting the big corporations, the business and franchise owners are going out of business. So much for jobs. Add to that the people running around with their iPhones, laptops, Gap jeans, sporting their J Crew and Ambercrombie fashions. Then you have the kids complaining about education when they are privileged to go to $200,000 a year colleges. While not all in this movement are like this, it makes me wonder about the true motivation. If this is really what they are all about, why are they wasting their time on Wall Street rather than taking some of that extra money they have and doing good with it? There's a rampant hypocrisy present here as well as a violent under-current where, if they don't get their way, you better watch your back. This is not the way of Christ. Jesus spoke out against power structures and the establishments of his day and called for justice for the poor, but he also lived a morally right life and lived out justice in his own every day actions. His words were backed up by his deeds and at no point in time did he forget that there were human beings involved. Even when he engaged people like the rich young ruler, the Pharisees, and others, he spoke to them as human beings and treated them like humans, not like mindless, faceless villains. The CEO's at the head of the corporations are people, too, and do not deserve how they are being pictured in society. Yes, they have made some bad choices, but haven't we all? So, as a graceless, hypocritical movement driven mostly by envy and a mindset of "I am as good as you" (see C.S. Lewis "Screwtape Proposes a Toast"), I don't think this is a movement that Christians can claim for their own.
Tea Party - How about them? Are they any better? Well, again, they are complaining about big government and the greed of the elite and the overwhelming almost totalitarian positioning of politicians in our government. Again, it is an anti-establishment movement, aiming at refocusing the United States away tax and spend politics and back to government remaining within the bounds described by the central law of the country. Along with that is the underlying morality of a sense of personal responsibility for your own choices and to not depend upon bail-outs, either to corporations or to individuals, to make up for mistakes. This all sounds well and good and, to be honest, I align myself more closely with Tea Party politics than with any other group out there. However, there's one really important problem that I see with this movement. Nationalistic pride and the idea of "This is God's country" or "This is a Christian nation" I see as serious problems for any Christian. While there is something to be said about the underlying morals and ideals of the country being based upon many of the teachings and understandings of the Protestant reformation and that, at the root of many of the ideals of the Constitution, are morals and ethics that can find their root in Christian theology, there has been only one politically organized nation in the history of the world that God himself established and that is Israel. And, really, even that is the Israel that was established by Joshua, upheld by the Judges, and initially ruled by David. Post-exile, even Israel couldn't necessarily claim God's blessing any more. As the apostle Paul puts it, Christians are aliens, strangers, foreigners, sojourners in this world. We are here, in the world, living amongst the people, but this is not our home. The ideals, the rules, the ethics, and the morals by which we live find their home in a Kingdom that is both here and not yet. As much as I like living in the US and am proud of the freedoms we enjoy, I realize that even the US is a temporary thing. It will not last forever. What we call our democratically formed republic is a shadow of what God's Kingdom might look like. It is distorted, imperfect and is certainly NOT the end of things. No human system can claim this, no matter how much they claim to be inspired by God's kingdom. Plato had it right when he commented that what we try and do in this world is only a shadowy reflection, warped and twisted, of the perfection that God has in mind. So, while our country is a good country, we cannot hold it in such a high regard that we think that it is God's blessed country and everyone else must emulate us. Add to that some of a similar hypocrisy that, what the Tea Party criticizes (government involvement) is something the Tea Party reaps the benefit of (public transportation, social security, roads, bridges, etc). Jesus did not support Rome, nor did he support the established Temple hierarchy, nor did he support the Jewish monarchy, nor did he put forth some sort of revolution or rebellion where he would supplant the existing power structures with one of his own. This was not the way of Jesus and we should not think that such is our way.
So... what does this mean? It means that we can take the good things from both these movements and use them to talk about the injustices in society, about reforming and redeeming the existing power structures, and about personal issues of personal morality, ethics, and justice. But we cannot take these movements and say one is more Christian than another, that one should be adopted by Christians and backed by Christians. They are political movements, aimed at politics, looking at changing earthly structures.
Think of the problems in our country as symptoms of a disease. There is greed running rampant. There are morality, ethics, and justice issues on all fronts. There are people killing others, either directly or indirectly. There are people taking power that doesn't belong to them or demanding power that they have no right to demand. There are people looking to earthly systems to fix their problems rather than looking to the spiritual realm for answers. The disease is sin, both personal as well as communal. Any socio-economic-political system put in place without addressing the disease is like putting bandage on a scratch when there is a cancerous tumor underneath. It's like giving someone over-the-counter cough medicine to treat the viral pneumonia. It's like giving ibuprofen to bring down the fever caused by viral meningitis. Treating the symptoms is a temporary problem. To bring about permanent solutions, you need to treat the disease.
And as I said, the disease is sin. When individual people sin, the result is an overall communal sin. Communal sin has as its root problems in the hearts and minds of people because it is people who make up communities. If you really want to change the world, you can rage all you want at the systems, the structures, the organizations that grow out of communities but it will not fix the problem, ultimately. So, what will fix it?
So here's what I want you to do, God helping you: Take your everyday, ordinary life—your sleeping, eating, going-to-work, and walking-around life—and place it before God as an offering. Embracing what God does for you is the best thing you can do for him. Don't become so well-adjusted to your culture that you fit into it without even thinking. Instead, fix your attention on God. You'll be changed from the inside out. Readily recognize what he wants from you, and quickly respond to it. Unlike the culture around you, always dragging you down to its level of immaturity, God brings the best out of you, develops well-formed maturity in you. Romans 12:1-2, The MessageSo, by all means, speak out if you feel you need to. Speak against the injustices you see around you. But your words will mean nothing if you don't point people to the real answer. No amount of political movements will mean anything of any lasting value. As The Teacher points out in the book of Ecclesiastes, it's all just so much vapor. It's all temporary and meaningless in the light of eternity. The only thing that really matters is to live a righteous life. And the only way to achieve that is through the transforming power of the grace and mercy of God given us through the life, death, and resurrection of God's son, Jesus. Before we can change the structures of the world for any lasting good, we first need to change the people. We need to get out there and tell them, as Paul told the Athenians, "Hey, you are definitely a spiritual people. You have so much right. But let me tell you more about this Unknown God..." and then show them the Truth that is Christ.
Christians of the world unite! We have a mission, and it is not on Wall Street and it is not in Washington, DC. It is in the hearts, minds, and lives of the people we see every day. When the power of God breaks through in their lives, everything else will fall into place. People will start acting justly to their neighbors. People will start valuing ethics and morality over greed. People will start thinking more about how they can help other people than they will about personal gain. Christians off the world unite! We have been given a mission and we are late in the game, a mission to speak the truth and live like we believe it.
Remember, it's our job.



I think you've made good points both about some of the flaws in the two movements, and the comparative internal revolution represented by Christianity in its original, early form.
ReplyDeleteHere are a couple of other flaws your ideas reminded me about. Both movements began organically from small groups, as did Christianity, but the more they become monetized, the closer all three grow to be similar to the institutions they were founded in opposition to.
There are so many things I agree with in this article that it will be quicker just to point out my largest disagreement. I don't think the sort of Christianity you describe is well represented in most organized churches, which is where the vast majority of people who call themselves Christians are found. Therefore, I don't know where you are going to be able to contact these Christians you want to unite.
The U.S. as it is now shares enough characteristics with the culture of Rome under the 12 Caesars that I won't be very surprised if our obese, corrupt nation receives some form of a sacking by leaner, more vigorous "barbarians" from elsewhere.
Meanwhile, I'll just keep trying to be frugal, ethical and generous, not because God says I should, but because cooperative systems are always more sustainable than competitive ones.
Thanks, Mikey.
ReplyDeleteWhile I agree that many Christians in many churches probably are stuck in the "institutionalized" church, one of the main reasons I've stuck with the Mennonite denomination is because of its core emphasis on genuine Christianity. At the core of the theology is a holistic faith modeled after the life of Christ. This is becoming more the norm these days.
So my blog posts I'm not trying to necessarily "recruit" people but more a prophetic word to the church in general to wake up and get to work
Robert,
ReplyDeleteI thought that your running definition of the Wall Street folks was a bit off the mark. First, the movement has no actual agenda--if you've been down to the park you'll find lots of different people with different ideas on what needs to be done. The protest isn't about CEOs, but what people see as rampant greed. As far as tourism goes, most people don't stop by Wall Street to take photos of guys wearing business suits. I also imagine that the area businesses got a lift BECAUSE of all the foot traffic--it sure would be interesting to see those statistics. As far as the Tea Party, you missed the Ayn Rand/Objectivist philosophy that runs through the group. People want less government so they will have to pay less taxes because there will be less in the way of social programs and that means more for them. This is an "individuals first" group that isn't concerned with the larger society and we can see the fruit of that group in this present Congress. You're right that in the light of eternity all of this is meaningless, but there's a nihilistic edge to that kind of thinking. Since we live in a democratic society (as opposed to a first century dictatorship)we have a social responsibility to speak out for the public good. It may not be my eternal home, but at the moment, it's the one I am living in and it would be nice to leave it better than I found it.
Matt,
ReplyDeleteI'm afraid you missed the point. The point was not an exhaustive description and definition of either group but to present an arguement that neither group truly is a "Christian" endeavour and has components in it that Christians should be extremely wary of.
Additionally, there is an underlying component to both movements that somehow, if we can change the worldly system that somehow this will fix things. This is the biggest falsehood of all. To change either Wall Street or the government without addressing the underlying human problem of greed and self-interest is a temporary endeavour at best but is most likely, in the current culture, to be driven, again be self-interest.
Rob - to your point that neither the government, the Tea Party or OWS is truly a "Christian" endeavour - that troubles you? I see that as a good thing. A "Christian" government would be a theocracy and a "Christian" OWS movement or Tea Party would be a cult. I feel anything is possible when it comes to changing things in our society. People speaking out for justice for the oppressed in a peaceful way was successful for civil rights. In all of our society there are components that Christians need to be wary -that is where discernment comes in. Speaking collectively for peace and justice in our current economic system is something that transcends Christianity or any faith for that matter. The OWS movement in my opinion is not motivated by covetousness or looking for hand outs as some claim but instead they seek to look out for the interests of those most vulnerable and hurting in this nation. The OWS protesters have only their voices and their bodies to occupy a space to get the attention of politicians. It is sad that many begrudge them even that. The wealthy, including Christians, are able to legally buy access to politicians to obtain favors and self-serving tax cuts. Kurt Willems wrote a great piece on the OWS... http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/2011/10/25/the-powers-that-be-the-gift-of-enemies-and-occupywallstreet-ows/
ReplyDeleteShari,
ReplyDeleteFirst, no, it doesn't bother me. What bothers me is the claims, for both movements, that they somehow are something to be celebrated by Christians, that people ARE claiming "It's what Jesus would want." And yes, both sides do it.
Claiming the government is a "Christian" thing is also a bad thing. But again, if you think about it, what exactly are Christians doing when they are saying "Vote for such-and-so, it's the Christian thing to do?" Aren't they, in so many words saying, "If we vote for enough 'Christian' things, we'll have a 'Christian' government." And, yes, both sides do it. The Religious Right and the Christian Left, both claim a high moral ground when campaigning for a particular political cause and the rhetoric from both sides make an implication that their candidate, their cause, is somehow the "right" one to do.
So, first, you missed my point. My point was not that I was troubled that they aren't Christian movements... my point is that I'm troubled that people actually CLAIM that they are. It really disturbs me to see Mennonite publications come out and say "We need to get along side of OWS and support the cause" or evanglical publications saying the same about the Tea Party. I say, "RUN AWAY!!!" Fast. Get away. We have no business with the political aspects of either movement.
We can point to OWS or the Tea Party and say, as I pointed out, that there are some good things, some just things, some moral and ethical things about both movements that we can tease out... but by no means associate with either of them to the point where we champion them.
I do agree that, as Christians, we need to speak out for justice, for peace. And the civil rights movement, as you pointed out, is a prime example of that. However, when I look at OWS, as I pointed out above, what do I see? I see people saying "Give me a college education. Give me a house. Give me a good job where I can make enough money to buy my laptop and iPhone." No, they aren't all like that, but there is rampant hypocrisy throughout the movement and we have no business being among them.
(continued from above) Speak for justice, but consider what you're asking. Nobody is exactly alike and different people have different abilities and, therefore, have different life styles and different standards of living. Don't step on people on the way up, but certainly we aren't all the same.
ReplyDeleteTake a look at this article from Mennonite Weekly Review. http://www.mennoweekly.org/blog/2011/11/8/prosperity-gospel-disparity-gospel/
In other words, there is nothing evil about having money. Like there is nothing evil about not having money. It's what you do about it that is where the evil falls. The rhetoric from OWS is that anyone who has money must, inherently, by greedy and oppressive. This is just not true.
Simple fact: to qualify for the 1%, the minimum amount of money you need to make is NOT in the millions, but around $350,000. And you know who that is? That's an exec of a small 100 person S-Corporation. It's no millionaire. It's the kind of person who actually creates jobs... so the rhetoric is saying that such a person, simply because they are in the top 1%, is evil. I don't even make 6 figures and I'm still in the top 25%. Am I evil?
(continued some more)
ReplyDeleteI'm not begrudging the OWS protesters for speaking out. I'm critiquing that they better practice what they preach. They complain about greed, and yet there are, among them, people who are, themselves, benefiting from that greed.
And I agree that the whole lobbying and PAC and "who has the most money wins the election" problem is a serious problem... but who is paying for the movements, either left or right, but people with money. I see a big problem with movements that complain about money buying elections when they themselves are benefiting from the same system.
I read Kurt's article and, to a point, I agree with it. On principle, we should stand for justice. But also on principle, political movements are inherently problematic because they are relying on institutions that, at their core, do not recognize the Lordship of Jesus. Why spend our time, money, and effort on such a temporary endeavor when we have the Kingdom among us in the form of the church?
This is my point... yes, we can look at and lift up the good things from the two movements... but our time is better spent. I won't give it away, but I want you to read 1 Thessalonians 4 and 5, texts for my sermon this coming Sunday, and consider what Paul is telling a bunch of people who are living in an oppressive society where greed is rampant and political power is bought by money and social status.
My last paragraph is my real thrust on this. Political movements will come and go and are temporary solutions at best. We can stand for civil rights but, if you think about what happened in the 60's, the world changed not because of politics, but because people's hearts were changed. With the change of heart came the change of policy.
(more continuation)
ReplyDeleteRead this article: http://takingtheyoke.blogspot.com/2011/11/baby-jesus-super-power.html?spref=fb Specifically notice point number 2 towards the end. Good works are good works... but they are self-serving if they are not driven and motivated first out of a change of heart and an annointing of the Spirit.
Think about how the early Christians changed their world. They could not vote, they could not lobby, they had no say, really, in the government...but the government paid attention when they simply acted, when they, as Christians, acted like Christ in their society and, by doing so, disturbed that society. They didn't protest, have sit ins, "occupy", or have any gatherings. They just lived radically different.
Another article for you: http://www.jesusradicals.com/the-myth-of-the-state-as-savior-and-elections-as-confession-of-faith/
Consider that in light of either political movement... both OWS and Tea Party are assuming that, somehow, the state will "save" us and that, by voting the right way, somehow we'll improve things. That's putting faith in the worldly system. While I agree that God can work through such systems, what would happen if we changed people's hearts FIRST? What if, instead of campaigning for votes, we campaigned for souls? Vote your conscience, vote the way you believe, but when out there working among people, wouldn't it be better to, instead of trying to convince them to vote your way, how about we point them to the transforming power of Christ so that, when it comes time to vote, they won't need convincing?
See, that's my point... it's a matter of the focus of effort... where do we put our time and energy? So much time and energy is being expended by the church in the last couple of decades to support one political group or another. If we spent as much energy bring people into that right relationship with God as we do trying to influence politics, imagine what this world would be like?
I know my opinion is not popular by either left or right and frankly I don't care. I'm not intending to be popular, I'm intending to speak truth. And the truth is that the kingdoms of this world, yes, even the great USA, will pass away. Frankly, I give the US no more than 10 years... Instead, I think it's time to focus on the eternal Kingdom.
And if you missed that point in the blog post, hopefully I've made that point in this comment. Society is made up of people. If you want to change society, you need to first change the people. Top down economics doesn't work. Neither does top down ethics. Or top down morals. You have to change the foundation on which society is built. And that is the hearts and minds of the people. "Go and make disciples". Not "Go and campaign for Obama" or "Go and campaign for Cain" or "Go and campaign for Romney" or "Go and campaign for OWS" or "Go and campaign for the Tea Party". No. It's "Go and make disciples". And that is a TOTALLY and radically different call than anything the political systems of this world can come up with.
And if that doesn't make my point, I don't know what will. Sorry this is so long, but frankly, I'm sick and tired of both the left and the right trying to convince me that worldly politics, somehow, is the answer. As a Mennonite, I cannot ignore 5 centuries of teaching that say that the governments of this world CANNOT be relied on to be just, only the church. And by "church" I mean that global organism that is the body of Christ, not the institutionalized religion. Let the church be the church, to quote John Howard Yoder. Right now, we're not being the church. We're just another lobbying organization and that's just sad.